Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 06:47
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What are some signs that a therapist may have poor boundaries with their clients?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Which country has the best and strictest legal system in the world?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
China fast tracks rare earth export licences for European companies - Financial Times
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Quantum Space raises $40 million - SpaceNews
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
3 Economic Events That Could Affect Your Portfolio This Week, June 16-20, 2025 - TipRanks
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What is the kinkiest thing you and your sex partner have done in bed?